THE ELECTRONIC NOTARY
A
Report by
Michael Lightowler
[Council
member of the Notaries' Society]
Introduction
It is
time to review the progress that has been made and the
progress that has not been made towards the development of
the Cyber Notary in the UK. Back in 2000 we reported
progress in terms that showed how frustrated we were at the
slow progress of electronic commerce and the development of
the role of the Notary. We said then:- The worldwide
discussions about the principles had pretty much come to an
end. It seems to be universally acknowledged that:-
(a) the use of electronic communications will advance
rapidly in commerce;
(b) communications on the open internet cannot be regarded
as secure;
(c) businessmen ought to want security;
(d) they do not yet appreciate the importance but rely on
closed systems for large matters and take the risk for
small ones;
(e) any system to provide extra security and open systems
must consist of strong encryption within a public key
infrastructure system (PKI) provided by trusted third
parties;
(f) many governments still see such systems as a threat to
security;
(g) governments and their organisations are beginning to
use electronic communications for their own purposes in a
number of different contexts.
Having got thus far things had begun to move more slowly
than had been expected. Since then it has become clear that
the Government are withdrawing from their active promotion
of reliable electronic communication between citizens and
the State although several departments are moving forward
(notably the Land Registry) and others are trying. It has
also become clear that PKI (which seemed to all of us then,
and still seems to us as Notaries, to offer the only true
security) may be too difficult and too expensive to adopt.
It has appeared that business organisations are not yet
ready to accept the risks they take in open communications
on the Internet and those who are concerned about security
are relying on closed systems (while taking inadequate
precautions to control entry to those systems).
In May
2001 we produced a statement explaining the role and place
of the Notary in electronic commerce. We set out our view
that Notaries could and should be prepared to carry out
their traditional functions for the authentication of
transactions entirely electronically. We argued that
Notaries were uniquely placed to provide reliable
registration authority services to the providers of systems
or of services. We warned then that there were
obstacles:-
“There
are already a large number of major players in the field
– mostly offering relatively low levels of
certification at very modest prices. To offer higher
standards at much higher fees will not necessarily appeal
to a large market. The trick – which will be aligned
between the commercial success and failure – will be
to pitch a proper but not excessive level of security at a
reasonable fee which is proportionate to the commercial
sensitivity and importance of the documents being
transmitted. Most Notaries are not at the front of
electronic developments. Whilst most are now capable of
using a PC for word processing and e-mails, they are most
comfortable with the simplest of installations which they
expect to operate without expensive software support. The
need will be to find a platform for the transmission of
encrypted electronic documents between participating
Notaries which can be simply and cheaply installed on any
PC and will seamlessly encrypt emails and identify the
sender. Whilst it is hoped that there will, in due course,
be electronic legalisation through the Foreign and
Commonwealth Office, this will take a very long time as it
will require amendments to the Hague Convention and their
subsequent adoption by the different countries.”
Aims
of the Report
The
remainder of this Report attempts to do three things:-
Firstly we show
that there are Notaries who are willing and able to deal
with transactions in the electronic environment and that
there is in place, as a result of the Pilot Project of
Notaries for E-Commerce, a workable infrastructure (i.e.
the technology) to achieve this.
Secondly we show
that Notaries are willing and able to provide
“registration authority services” to providers,
to the public and to Government and public authorities,
either through the tradition of personal appearance and
verification of documents or information, or by the
disciplined scrutiny of electronically certified identity
and authority.
Thirdly we show
how Notaries themselves can fulfil one of their most
important duties, the keeping of their records, in an
electronic form that will incorporate added security to the
current procedures for the identification of individuals,
the most immediate and important requirement in so many
transactions. Notaries will be ready to meet the demand for
their services when it comes, either because the Government
once again takes seriously its own concerns about the
reliability of the information it receives and upon which
its governs, or because business concerns and individuals
come to realise the risks they take in insecure
communications can be avoided. It may be that a demand and
a market place will only arise when there has been a
significant disaster – we hope that they will arise
because the public realise that Notaries have something
useful to offer.
Part I – Notaries for E-Commerce Pilot Report
Introduction
In
November l999 Notaries for E-Commerce (NEC) was formed as a
not-for-profit company for the sole purpose of undertaking
an E-Commerce Pilot Project for Notaries and in order to
receive funds by way of donations from Notaries to enable
it to proceed with the pilot. The Project was independent
but backed by the Notaries Society in England and Wales and
also supported by the Society of Scrivener Notaries of
London and by Notaries in the Channel Islands. Its
activities were complimentary to those of Cyber Notaries
UK. A contract was signed with technology service
providers, Software Box Limited, for the managed
installation and operation of a Baltimore uni-cert
certification authority (CA) sited within a secure
environment and using PKI technology. The managed CA
service was designed to register Notaries, issue X.509
certificates, revoke certificates and cross certify with
one other CA. NEC retained all procedural controls of the
CA operation. Software Box provided dial in access to the
CA service for a number of individual Notaries, selected
from across the country, subject to the user systems being
stand alone, installed with MS Windows and MS Outlook and
having a specified minimum configuration of memory and disk
space. Software Box also provided training and user
support. The project was launched on 8 November
2002.
Management
of the Project
It was
recognised that project management would be difficult since
the user population was widely dispersed across the Country
and NEC had no central head quarters. It was decided that
participating Notaries would need to be able to commit time
to project work on Wednesdays and also be able to access
technical support within their own law firms. The project
relied heavily upon individual Notaries taking up their own
ideas with members of the Project team as appropriate and
building up discussion groups via email. Several ad hoc
meetings were held, also three steering group meetings and
two teleconferences and there has been a good deal of
contact between Directors of NEC and the Project Manager.
At the time of training, Notaries were registered and
issued with digital signatures, which were then held in
store on the site server to be requested via email when
needed. At the same time, Notaries equipment was
commissioned and installed with the Software Box
application interface software enabling Notaries to enter
on screen relevant client information, together with their
own recording of the event being notarised and the digital
signatures of both appearers (i.e. clients) and Notaries
who would complete the Notarial Act. Initial Project work
took the form of Notaries practising a simple application,
namely the witnessing of an Oath of Allegiance. This was to
acquire hands on knowledge of, and experience in, the use
of the computer and to test the procedures put in place to
support the effective operation of the CA. The problems
identified each week would govern the following
week’s activity. A user guide was produced in hard
copy for each Notary and also published on the NEC website.
The Notaries initially worked in pairs in role play mode
sending digitally signed documents to each other acting as
relying parties. In effect, each Notary would
“invent” a client, satisfy himself in the
normal way regarding his true identity and then
electronically request Software Box to provide a digital
signature certificate for that appearer. This would be
granted and acknowledged by email. The Notary would then
follow screen prompts allowing him to key in the
information required. This initially pertained to the Oath
of Allegiance, but later covered the range of work carried
out by Notaries for clients. The Notary would then
nominally request the appearer to press the button,
effectively adding the appearer’s encoded signature
to the document. The Notary’s next action would be to
key in whatever comments were required to complete the
Notarial act and then add his own digital signature and
seal. The document was then emailed in encoded form to the
Software Box secure site and the appearer’s
certificate revoked, since it will have been issued for a
one time transaction only.
Initial
Outcome of the Pilot
Early
findings showed the following:-
• Notaries are well capable of conducting Notarial
business electronically and there is widespread interest in
taking forward the notion of developing a secure electronic
Notarial service for the future.
•
There is considerable lack of understanding outside the
Notarial profession about the function of the Notary and
this ignorance in industry has contributed to the absence
in the market place of fit for purpose products needed to
be integrated into an electronic Notarial service
specification without risk to the acknowledged integrity of
the profession.
• The delays and difficulties met as a direct result
of under-resourcing and under- funding the pilot have meant
that the pilot objectives, specifically those concerning
the development of the underlying procedural
infrastructures and protocols needed to support successful
CA implementation, have not been able to be met within the
planned timescale. Throughout the project close attention
was given to the relevant activity ongoing in the UK and
Europe regarding the setting of standards and legislation
covering electronic signatures and qualified certificates.
The NEC Chairman sat on the Board of tScheme, which is the
Government supported industry led, self regulatory
enterprise engaged in setting approval criteria for trust
services and emerging as the preferred alternative to Part
I of the Electronic Communications Act 2000.
Membership of the E-Centre Legal Group and other bodies
have kept NEC abreast of activities in the area of law
enforcement and human rights which also have implications
for the take up of E-Commerce. Awareness of wider global
activity comes to NEC from its association with Cyber
Notaries UK. NEC has also had extensive meetings with
commercial organisations willing to engage the UK Notarial
profession in “live” electronic Notarial
business and has also promoted the profession through the
office of the E-envoy.
Principal
Conclusions
If we
are to draw any conclusions from the Project, the main one
must be that the technology does exist to enable Notaries
to conduct their business utilising the Internet in a
secure and efficient way and that such technology is
developing in a manner which will ensure that business
conducted electronically can be made to be as secure and
reliable as is necessary to meet the needs of the parties
to the relevant transaction. The technology exists now to
enable Notaries in England and Wales, using as a base the
systems developed by NEC, to be able to engage in
electronic commerce at a reasonable cost.
The installation of software and the availability of secure
servers mean that the Notary’s ability (subject to
the normal identification checks) to prepare, authenticate
and dispatch to foreign jurisdictions private and
commercial documents of the kind dealt with by Notaries on
a day to day basis is something available now and can be
installed with relative ease. Our research and the contacts
we have made mean that Notaries can be enabled (with
suitable preparation and training) to begin providing an
electronic service as soon as it is wanted (see paragraph 3
below “Specific Projects”).
Where documents require legalisation, either the system of
legalisation will need to change (perhaps enabling duly
registered Notaries to have the ability to prove their own
credentials?) or the offices which deal with legalisation
or consularisation will themselves need to embrace
electronic commerce. The issue for all those in the
profession who wish to participate in electronic commerce
is whether there is a definable market for the provision of
electronic Notarial services.
Many Notaries today rely upon the Internet and electronic
means of communication to go about their daily business but
the final product of their service is invariably a hard
copy of a (non-electronic) document bearing original
(non-digital) signatures made with pen and ink and
legalised in a hard copy form by the Foreign and
Commonwealth Office and/or the relevant Embassy or
Consulate which is dispatched overseas by mail or courier.
The Notarial profession is proceeding at different speeds
across the world to embrace electronic commerce. The speed
of progress towards Notarial E-Commerce is limited not only
by the cost and availability of relevant technology but
also by the varying desires of Notaries in each country to
adopt E-Commerce, the legislation of the relevant
jurisdictions, the resources available to Notaries and the
demands of the clients whom the profession serves. There is
little doubt that the methods of working within the
profession will eventually move at an increasing pace
towards the wider adoption of E-Commerce. The most rapid
progress has been made in those countries whose Notaries
are officials appointed by the State and where the
legislation introducing electronic commerce is matched by
the availability of resources. Given that at present there
are no proposals under UK domestic law to appoint Notaries
to positions of State Officials as is the case in many
civil law countries - the move towards electronic commerce
will have to come either from changes in legislation
requiring transactions to be conducted electronically, or
by the initiative of Notaries to force a change in the way
that Notarial Acts are performed (which in itself has
limitations) or by a general movement towards the adoption
of E-Commerce in the execution and transmission of
documents which is likely to take some years yet to evolve.
In the UK the greatest progress made to date in the field
of E-Commerce (so far as the legal profession is concerned)
is in electronic conveyancing where significant public
resources have been made available to the Land Registry and
the legal profession must invest in new relevant technology
if it wishes to continue to practice in that field.
Part II – Development of Electronic Commerce for
Notaries
If the
adoption of electronic commerce by Notaries is to be
determined solely by the needs of those whom it serves
(i.e. demand led), progress towards achieving such a state
is likely to take some years and to be adopted only by
those members of the profession who are or who become
electronically literate and whose clients demand such
service. Some Notaries feel that the provision of such a
service (irrespective of demand) is a preparation for what
will certainly occur in due course and may be likely to
promote among his own clients a desire to increase their
use of and reliance upon electronic transactions. Otherwise
progress will only be realised in response to a need to
embrace electronic commerce in order to stay in business
(cf. electronic conveyancing) or if Notaries successfully
promote themselves to a position where new services which
it offers, either to the State or its citizens, are taken
up and can only be conducted electronically. As E-Commerce
becomes the norm rather than the exception, digital
signatures and electronic encryption and transmission of
documents take the place of current practice, Notarial
intervention will become increasingly difficult unless the
profession has moved itself to a position where Notarial
intervention in electronic form can be seen to be more
efficient and less expensive than current methods. If
Notaries do not embrace E-Commerce in all its aspects and
actively seek new roles, business opportunities will be
lost and the profession will be in danger of limiting
itself to paper transactions which have a built in
obsolescence.
During the course of the last two years there have been a
number of suggestions made as to areas where Notaries could
usefully provide additional services and do so
electronically. These are principally although not
exclusively in areas where Notarial skills of
identification and authentication may be seen as a way of
reducing fraud. Examples of these are:-
(a) At present it is envisaged by the Land Registry that
applications for dealings in registered land will be
submitted electronically by Solicitors, Notaries, Licensed
Conveyancers and other authorised persons who have Service
Agreements in place to access the Land Registry’s
electronic network. However, the Land Registry are obliged
to provide access to citizens who wish to do their own
conveyancing. Private Conveyancers accessing the network
who have not been subjected to the scrutiny of a Solicitor
in terms of identification and money laundering checks
could expose the conveyancing system to possible fraud.
This seems an ideal situation for a Notary to provide an
interface between the Land Registry and the private
applicant to ensure checks on identity and proper
authentication are carried out.
(b) The Financial Services Authority is extending its
supervisory involvement to an increasingly wide area of
commerce including banks, financial services intermediaries
and now insurance companies and brokers. Applications for
licenses to conduct business are becomingly increasingly
complex and the production of photocopied passports,
driving licences and utility accounts are becoming common
place. A single endorsement by a Notary on a relevant
application form where the necessary identity checks have
been made could speed up the process and make the
identification process more reliable.
(c) Some Notaries have identified problems which may exist
in relation to fraudulent applications for grants of
probate and letters of administration. There are many such
applications made by private individuals but it is
considered that the scope for fraudulent activity could be
considerable because insufficient checks are made into the
identity and capacity of those making the applications and
into the genuineness of the Wills and other documents which
are offered as evidence of the applicant’s right to
be appointed. Checks of the kind customarily made by
Notaries in their course of their work could help reduce
the incidence of such fraud by ensuring that all such
applications are endorsed by a Notary prior to submission
to the Probate Registry.
Part III – Enjoa
Notaries
in England and Wales are required by the rules of their
profession to keep proper records of all their Notarial
Acts. The manner in which such records are kept and their
quality may vary considerably between Notaries. Proper
record keeping is an essential part of good practice and
the introduction of a system which would ensure that
records are kept in a secure, legible and consistent format
would enhance the practice of Notaries. The National Notary
Association in the United States (“NNA”) has
developed a suite of software which can record Notarial
Acts on a PC or laptop with ease, efficiency and security.
It ensures that correct entries are made providing all the
necessary information which needs to be recorded. The
software is capable of capturing a signer’s or
witnesse’s thumb print and signature and of taking a
picture of the appearer using a digital web camera. As a
safeguard it is possible to save back-ups of the electronic
register. The NNA has been approached to enable trials of
the product to take place in England and Wales. If
successful the software could be adjusted to cater for the
necessary changes which will be needed to conform to UK
practice and terminology and its use eventually licensed
for distribution to UK Notaries. The use of any system
which provides a uniform method of recording Notarial acts
in a reliable and secure way must be encouraged. As many
members of the Notaries Society will know, a demonstration
of ENJOA (Electronic Notaries Journal of Official Acts) was
given in September 2004 at the Society’s AGM in Bury
St Edmunds. This demonstration underlined the ease with
which Notarial Acts could be recorded in a safe and
consistent manner including the capture of thumb and finger
prints and signature. Members of the Society will now be
asked to indicate the level of interest which might exist
to see if it is worth approaching the NNA to supply
suitably “anglicised” versions of the software
for use in England and Wales.
3. Specific Projects
In the
course of NEC’s many encounters and meetings held in
various parts of the country in the last four years, it has
made contact with a number of commercial organisations who
have developed software of the kind which could be adapted
for use in Notarial E-Commerce and who either have or have
access to the installations necessary to conduct and manage
secure transactions and to issue classes of digital
certificates which may be relied upon in a wide range of
commercial transactions.
NEC has been offered assistance by these three
organisations to develop secure systems for Notaries and
contact is being maintained; however no further action has
been taken. The opportunity to explore these relationships
further and to provide Notaries with the ability to offer
true electronic services does exist but will require an
investment of time and resources to proceed to the next
stage. Realistically this could not be achieved by as small
a group as has operated through NEC to date.
Since the NEC Project started, there has been a good deal
of progress made in understanding what is required to
provide electronic services; the cost of creating and
managing such a service has reduced as technology has
advanced and become more easily available. If Notaries who
are interested in developing a state of the art system in
the UK come forward in sufficient numbers, there is no
reason why good progress cannot be made. However the extent
to which Notaries could use such technology in a way which
is more profitable to them than with current practices,
would only become evident over time. It would mean that
those who did invest in such a project would be best placed
to exploit E-Commerce when it becomes a necessary part of
everyday life as surely it will. A necessary part of making
further progress will be to produce a technical
specification on which such a system can be built.
4.
Thanks
The
completion of the Pilot Project and the writing of this
Report would not have been possible without the generous
contributions which have been made by many individual
Notaries throughout England and Wales and the Channel
Islands as well as the support of Baltimore Technologies
and of various professional organisations including The
Notaries Society and The Society of Scrivener Notaries.
These financial contributions and the dedication of a
number of individuals who together have contributed
literally thousands of hours in attending meetings with
Government and commercial organisations, investigating a
wide range of proposals of possible interest to Notaries in
the field of electronic commerce, have resulted not only in
raising the profile of Notaries but in gaining a vast
amount of knowledge and experience which will assist the
profession in developing its future involvement in
E-Commerce in whatever form it chooses to do that.
5.
Closing Comments
A
principal lesson to be learned is that if further progress
is to be made, it will require a concerted effort by a
larger group of Notaries interested in promoting electronic
commerce and the future of the profession to build
relationships with the companies who have offered their
help and to pursue some of the ideas canvassed in this
Report. Resources will also be needed. If third party
funding is to be sought, any commercial project is only
likely to attract sufficient funds where there is a sound
business plan produced as a basis for the Project. Unless
purely investigatory (which is unlikely to attract
sufficient funding) such a Project would necessarily
require at least the suggestion of a return on investment
which could only be met from a market place willing to
purchase electronic services from Notaries. In a country
where Notarial intervention is generally speaking limited
to documents for use overseas, any estimates of a return on
capital to potential investors are likely to be
speculative. Development of new opportunities for Notaries
to perform authentification/certification services within
the UK would be likely to benefit the profession as a
whole. We will therefore continue to explore with the
Government other possible ways of achieving this. If
successful, the ability to be able to deliver such services
electronically is likely to enhance rather than diminish
the possibility of broadening the range of Notarial
services within the UK. The NEC project has shown there are
many UK Notaries who are ready to take a full part in
contributing towards the building of a trustworthy
environment for the conduct of global business via the
Internet. The Project has proved that participation by
Notaries in the field of electronic commerce is technically
possible and the relevant legislation and technology are in
place. All that is now required is to harness the
enthusiasm and resources of a sufficiently wide group of
Notaries to make electronic services available and for
there to be a market ready willing and able to accept them.
Michael
Lightowler
Notary Public
November 2004
E-mail
:
ml@notaryservices.co.uk